For convenience,
here is the article that precipitated Kummer's comment.
Mr. Kummer neglects to mention the type and origin of kopi luwak samples he tasted. Did they come from The Philippines, or Indonesia, or perhaps elsewhere in SE Asia? He also didn't mention whether his samples were arabica, robusta (canephora), excelsa, or liberica. A writer as esteemed as Mr. Kummer, and as eager to show us readers, via Wikipedia reference-dropping (pun intended), all the cool places where he gets to "teach" despite the fact that such reference has zilch to do with the topic at hand, surely must know that most of the coffee cultivated in those regions are not arabica, the only type many connoisseurs consider worthy of use other than as a "blending", or filler, bean? For example, if Mr. Kummer had sampled some civet-processed excelsa, might its characteristic jackfruit notes have been the "sweet aftertaste" Mr. Kummer mentions? But surely, "the dean among food writers" and "one of the most widely read writers in America" would have recognized jackfruit, no?
C'mon, dude. All the cool foodie kids know that ya gots to cite origin these days if ya wants foodie cred.
To be clear, I'm not endorsing civet coffee, because, in my experience, I don't prefer even great robusta over good arabica (as with almost everything, there are exceptions--some Sumatran robusta being one). I've "sampled"/drunk cups of civet coffee in Asia and in America. I think paying hundred of dollars per pound for any coffee is ridiculous--heck, I think the $14/lb. Charbucks wants for some of its (decaf) beans is borderline ridiculous. But certainly more ridiculous are Kummer's tone and his comparison of this coffee to horse meat.